|
|
|
bars & clubs restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() Click for words events Strange Feelings Richard Powers discusses his National Book Award-winning "The Echo Maker"
Five minutes after arriving at the Mariott Marquis for the National Book
Award ceremony, Richard Powers remembered he had forgot his finalist
medal, which the writers had been reminded to bring in case they were
photographed.
"I really should go back and get this," said the tall, 49-year-old
novelist, before bolting back to his hotel room.
As it turned out, Powers' hunch was right, as "The Echo Maker," his
ninth novel, beat out Mark Danielewski's "Only Revolutions" and three
other finalists to take home the prize. It is Powers' sixth novel to be
short-listed for a major American literary prize, but the first to win.
The novel tells the story of a 27-year-old man who emerges from a car
crash with a rare disorder called Capgras Syndrome. The man can
recognize his loved ones but doesn't believe they are who they claim to
be.
The book then follows the victim through his rehabilitation, which is
aided along by his anguished sister and a neuroscientist who is nearly
unraveled by the spectacle of the half-million cranes that migrate to
the Nebraska plain where the book takes place.
Thirty minutes before the ceremony began, Powers talked about the
book and its origins and what he hopes it says about our ability to
think and feel. What started you on "The Echo Maker"? A couple of things: Many years ago my two nephews were in a horrible
car accident and the person who found them left a note much like the
note that propels the plot in this book, and that's always haunted
me--that note.
Also, some years after, I was driving across country to see my
mother, who lives in Tucson, Arizona. I'd been on the road for many
hours and it was getting on toward sunset, I was in the middle of
Nebraska. And I looked out off the interstate and I saw this large
three-foot-high biped, then another. Then as far as I could see it was
this continuous carpet of birds. That must have been really strange. I almost drove off the road it was such a hypnotic and fascinating
sight. But that image was in the back of my mind when I began reading
neuroscience--that sense of these creatures that dance and sing and
gather together in this big city of birds and how they seemed vaguely
familiar but really, really alien--simultaneously something like humans,
but really, really far away from humans. How are the two related in the book? Well, when I came across the documentation about this syndrome,
Capgras Syndrome, whose fundamental feature is the inability to
recognize your loved ones--and only your loved ones! It got me thinking
about the animal intelligence that brings these hundreds of thousands of
birds to these places like clockwork, and also that weird feeling that I
felt that they were familiar and yet the most foreign thing I'd ever
seen. The hospital scenes are both vivid and terribly sad. Did you hang
out at a hospital much in the research? Well my brother is a surgeon, and I had spent a long time with him
during his residency and later on in his private practice, so there is a
fascination with medicine and the relationship between medicine and
storytelling has surfaced in my books a few times. The stories that we
tell ourselves--we the healthy when someone near us is in danger,
undergoing treatment--can be profoundly moving. There's a lot of humor in this book that is both a relief and a
surprise--how did that come about? I was a little nervous last night when I was reading from it, because
we have almost no other response to this stuff but to laugh sometimes,
but it's an anxious laughter.
Does what we know about the brain make it harder to operate as a
novelist now? After all, what we once thought of as our inner lives--the
thing novelists like Jane Austen so beautifully created--is basically a
mixture of the reptilian and chemical?
That's exactly what I wanted to do in this book. I wanted to tell a
story that quite clearly showed that you cannot make a separation
between knowing the world intellectually and knowing the world
emotionally. That all the different ways we know the world all come from
the brain, and they all depend on each other to make sense. In your previous books, you have written about RNA, music,
doctoring, the rise of capitalism, technology, singing, computers--is
part of the fun of writing for you assigning yourself a new
discipline? Without question. That to me--the discipline--is what opens up all
the passions people have about the world. We, in real life, articulate
our hopes and our fears about the world through the work we do. To get
to the real heart of who a person is you have to find out what they do
all day long. We've fallen into this convention that the human heart is
limited to interpersonal relationship and self-examination. It seems you could have gone into anyone of these fields
professionally. Why did you choose writing? Because I didn't have to choose. Novel-writing is the only place
where someone who would have liked to do anything can still do that
vicariously. If not in fact, at least in imagination. So over the course
of the years the books have been explorations, through characters, of
these different ways of knowing the world: history and biology, digital
computer technology. All of these are my opportunity to spend three or
four years vicariously pursuing the road not taken. The career one part
of me would have tried.
Also by John Freeman Palenstinian Consideration
Almost thirty years later, the lasting peace Carter thought the 1978
Camp David Accords would lead to remains elusive. But the thirty-ninth
president hasn't given up
Thought Full Gifts
Sky's the Limit
POETRY REVIEW
Without a Home
NONFICTION REVIEW
NONFICTION REVIEW
FICTION REVIEW
FICTION REVIEW
Bolivian Codes
NONFICTION REVIEW
FICTION REVIEW
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |