|
|
|
classifieds newsletter signup bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() HOLIDAY MOVIE PREVIEW Acting Out: Why are 2006 movies (especially holiday ones) full of blood and guts?
"How would you like your face smashed in?" was the bold slogan of a
memorable English anti-drunk-driving public-service ad. With the 2006
holiday-and-awards mashup of a movie season, getting your face smashed
in, as with the agreeably by-the-numbers pugilistic poundings of "Rocky
Balboa," would be getting off easy.
There's something in the air, and not just in the mainstreamed
torture-porn of the lucrative "Saw" and "Hostel" series or
Christmas
Day's "Black Christmas." It's also in major studio releases. Even
the
grown-ups, the "artistes," are acting up.
Development and production schedules of theatrical movies usually
require two to three years to move from conception to release. It's
been
five years since September 11; four years since we moved into
Afghanistan, and how long has that war in Iraq been going on? What's
been stewing in the creative kitchen across this stretch of time?
Consider "Apocalypto," the season's current top grosser, Mel
Gibson's vivid, very violent follow-up to the bloody sadism of his
"The
Passion of the Christ": among the pre-conquistador era violence, you
can choose from spearings, beheadings, poisoning and a blow to the head
that results in an aerated stream of blood as pink and encompassing as
body primer at an auto shop. There's one particularly grisly death
that
recalls the panoply of implements used to flay, slice and dice the body
of Christ. (Not for nothing did Gibson make a movie in 1999 called
"Payback.")
Curmudgeon Richard Schickel, a forty-year veteran of the reviewing
wars, is "discomfited" by the sexual component of Gibson's work, and
its "ritualistic staging." Gibson, writes the 73-year-old reviewer,
"loves to get people painfully restrained and then do really bad
things
to them...We are dealing with ritualized sadomasochism--an open
manifestation of one of those dark fantasies that those in thrall to
them must endlessly repeat and that have, of course, some sort of
psychosexual component." There's a larger question, however, of when
horrors like these are part of the cultural zeitgeist. The blood of
war,
and of incidents like Abu Ghraib, is not only on the hands of warriors
and artists.
No, Gibson is not alone and the dark doings aren't entirely in Mr.
Schickel's fantasies of Mr. Gibson's fixations: The spirited revival
of
the 007 franchise, "Casino Royale," is also a kind of sustained
footrace and throughout, it's hand-to-hand violent, with Daniel Craig
a
Bond who's shaken, stirred, bled and testicle-tortured. The barbarism
on
display inevitably evokes thoughts of other licenses to kill, torture
and disappear in the middle of the first decade of a dark new century.
Beyond Bond, the absence of escapist franchise pictures is
conspicuous. Summer was home to "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's
Chest," "The Da Vinci Code" and "Superman Returns." But Will
Smith's turn as an endlessly beleaguered dad in hyper-emotional hit
"The Pursuit of Happyness" is the closest thing to a reassuring
sob-maker this season; Nancy Meyers' souped-up woman-centered comedy
soaper "The Holiday" could also be considered in league with her hit,
"Something's Gotta Give." But more typical than those successful
brand
extensions is Martin Scorsese's "The Departed." Like many of his
pictures, it's about corruption, male vanity and the hope for
redemption, but it is also sleek craft whose deeper concerns are neatly
layered into a profane and violent action movie. Cruelty is unabated,
unabiding.
Even "Charlotte's Web," a misguided adaptation of E. B. White's
classic children's tale, while deadly, also deals with death and
hints,
"Babe"-like, at child characters who love their piglets, but bacon,
too. Oliver Stone, naturally, took the crack he was offered at the
biggest of historical subjects with "World Trade Center," and
threatens now to make a movie less about uplift and more about the
Byzantine pathways of conspiracy and collusion that he ordinarily
favors. 9/11 also provided grist for Danny Leiner's unlikely follow up
to "Harold and Kumar Go To White Castle," an ensemble melodrama
called
"The Great New Wonderful," capturing a sense of post-attack unease a
year after the events.
Not many of 2006's awards-coveting movies are overtly political, in
the manner of David O. Russell's 1999 acid, cynical "Three Kings,"
set
during the first American war in Iraq. Instead, they deeply inhale the
dour, subversive odor of metaphor. I can't get a question out of my
head
that Sacha Baron Cohen, in his Ali G guise, asked of Gore Vidal: "Is
history happening all the time?" It's a gorgeous non sequitur in
league
with the best of the entanglements of language and unexamined prejudice
in what is probably the year's most overtly political movie,
"Borat."
But history-for-history's sake went awry elsewhere, with Steven
Soderbergh's "The Good German" compacting "Casablanca" and "The
Third Man" into a profane, violent story that winds up being less
about
an ironic "good" German than a very bad Jew; Emilio Estevez's "Love
Boat'-style "Bobby" is less about the death of RFK than the
extinction
of 1960s-style idealism; "Blood Diamond"'s virtues of conscience and
visual craft are scuppered by a laundry list of the ills of Africa,
quickly leading to Atrocity Fatigue. More successful are the acting
showcases of "The Last King of Scotland" and "The Queen" (which are
both written or co-written by Peter Morgan), with Forest Whitaker's
cannibal dictator the fire to Helen Mirren's frost as Queen Elizabeth
in
the days after the death of Diana.
Other filmmakers have been more successful in fashioning their
earnestness into less didactic form. A chain of miscommunication that
begins with a good deed and continues with an errant, misunderstood
rifle shot is at the core of Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu's "Babel."
David Lynch says his three-hour digital-video opus, "Inland Empire,"
is about "a woman in trouble," yet so many movies in theaters between
now and the Oscars at the end of February are about men, women,
children
and nations in trouble.
Todd Field's superb, tonally impudent "Little Children" juggles
comedy, satire and earnest drama, exploring the effects of the return
to
a sunny suburb of a convicted sex offender who's taken for a child
molester. By story's end, there's a question whether we've seen a
single
grown-up taking their lives into their own hands. Alfonso Cuaron's
"Children of Men" partakes of canny present-tense futurism, a
thriller
set in the London of twenty years from now, yet also in the present
moment, dispensing with superficial science-fiction trappings to weave
an enthralling fable about the issues of immigration presently facing
both First and Third World nations.
Documentaries are in a class of their own, from the portrait of the
teaching of hate to children by American Taliban in "Jesus Camp," to
the death threats against the Dixie Chicks in "Shut Up and Sing," to
James Longley's impressionistic, tripartite view of the early stages
of
the war in "Fragments of Iraq." (See sidebar for more.) But
sixty-plus
years after the end of World War II, there are still fragments of the
twentieth century to be pieced together. Seventy-six-year-old Clint
Eastwood made two laconic pictures back-to-back about the World War II
battle at Iwo Jima; "Flags of Our Fathers" shows the psychic violence
visited on veterans of that conflict; "Letters from Iwo Jima,"
subtitled in English, examines the Japanese side of the story, with
even
more melancholy results. What does Old Man Clint describe about psychic
baggage and pyrrhic victories? How young men are sent to die for the
glory and power of old men.
And the small movie that deserves the kind of critical encomiums that
would draw a larger audience for its substantial virtues that opens in
a
few weeks is titled... "The Dead Girl." Karen Moncrieff's ensemble
drama etches the changes in half-a-dozen women's lives after a
woman's
body is discovered in a field, and there is blunt power and a pitiless
stare to her filmmaking. Shards of female fears and the effects of loss
are as brutal as anything in the jungles of "Apocalypto." Moncrieff
seems to demonstrate the same knowledge as Gibson, who said something
years ago to Canadian critic Brian D. Johnson: "People who don't deal
with guilt have a problem, unless you never do anything to transgress
what you know to be right or wrong. And there are very few people who
don't step over the line, because it's fun to fuck up. It is. You
can't deny it."
The
Materiel World
Also by Ray Pride Tip of the Week
Sentence Life
Gone Green Again
Tip of the Week
One Long Movie
Tip of the Week
School of Cock
Tip of the Week
Children Afraid of the Night
Craig, Daniel Craig
Tip of the Week
A Chicago Like No Other
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |