|
|
|
classifieds newsletter signup bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() The Non-Work Ethic Bridgeport and the ethos of corruption
To kill time, some people go for a jog, maybe go for a stroll or take in
a movie. In Bridgeport, you go for coffee. It's a neighborhood ritual:
five days a week, certain types--political insiders, local big-shots,
aspiring wannabes--collectively known as Magaffers, meet for coffee in
Bridgeport restaurants with lots of talking and bullshitting and
cigarettes. At these cultural summits, plans are made and deals are cut
that eventually make it to the light of day in the form of newspaper
headlines that almost always involve corruption and scandal. In the old
days, the mecca for these meetings was David's Restaurant on the corner
of 31st and Halsted. Although just a coffee shop, the minimum price
range of every conversation began at ten thousand dollars and soared
into the hundreds of thousands. "Despite all the money coming out of
their mouths," the owner once said, "if they could, half of them would
skip out without paying the check." David's burned down in 1980.
I am older now, and my father is much, much older. We too go for
coffee, still, grab a newspaper, and comment on the day's events with a
few friends in much the same way they do on any TV news show. Last year,
when the "Trucks for Hire" scandal broke, I said to my father, "Why
do these guys always persist at getting caught? They know the Feds are
always watching, yet they can't keep their hands out of the cookie jar.
They're like addicted thieves that can't kick the habit." Then he gave
me an unusual reply:
"Why not?" he said, "They should steal."
"What? I replied.
"They should steal," he repeated, "It's all they're good for,
it's all they know."
He went on to explain that like accountants crunch numbers and
athletes play at sports, certain types from the old Bridgeport were born
and raised to be thieves. "If you got a hunting dog," my father said,
"it hunts. Thievery is not a chosen lifestyle for these guys, it's who
and what they are. And it's about time the rest of the world understands
this."
First, I am not a pot that's about to call the kettle black. It's
important to note that my father is a convicted felon. He was a
safecracker, and served seven years at Joliet Penitentiary during the
late fifties to early sixties. Chicago's Bridgeport was once home to
almost a dozen small brewing companies like Edelweiss, Canadian Ace and
Meister Brau. These companies only did business in cash, so they were
lucrative targets for my father and his associates. But it's important
to note that any job that was pulled first had to be cleared with either
an 11th Ward, Bridgeport, official, or a 1st Ward, Chinatown, official,
meaning that certain people had to get a cut before a job was given the
go-ahead. Of course the majority of Bridgeport residents are hard-working,
dedicated people. I'm speaking of a diminishing group of old timers,
many currently under federal indictment, that were raised in the
neighborhood during the fifties and sixties, those who sought favor
either with the political machine or with the Mob, and most times with
both, again, those collectively known as Magaffers. But a little history
is appropriate here. It is inappropriate to say the non-work ethic of
Bridgeport when, in fact, the correct term is the non-work ethic of
Chinatown-Bridgeport (this does not include the Chinese). In the old
days, Chinatown was run by the Italians and was in fact an Italian
neighborhood, from 24th and Wentworth to 31st and Wentworth and was part
of the old 1st Ward. Fred Roti was the alderman, and nobody ever denied
his connection to the Mob, not even Freddy, as everyone called him. He
was a man beloved by all. Even nobodies could get a favor and a handout
from Freddy. During the sixties and seventies, it was still an era of
compassionate corruption. Today, in the current political environment,
if you're a nobody you're treated as a nobody, and they even tell you to
your face that you're a nobody. Back then, during the reign of Richard
J. Daley the father, crumbs were left on the street for the little guy
to eat. You could buy a fix or ask a favor. Today, the fix has moved
from the streets up to the corporate suites, exclusively so. The citizens of Bridgeport (and Chicago) condemn Daley with their
mouths, but love him in their hearts. He's the mayor for life, the
beloved dictator. Were Daley to close up shop tomorrow, the Chicago
media would cry the loudest. The man is solid, guaranteed copy. He and
his crew inflame and enrage, but above all titillate. They are our
celebrities. Contrary to what you might think, those from the
neighborhood who are indicted and sent to prison return as celebrated
heroes and not in shame. They are someone you should know, men of wisdom
and experience, men who get respect. Which has always led me to believe,
absurdly perhaps, that these men subconsciously wanted to be caught, so
as to partake of Chicago myth and legend, to be a part of Chicago
history. It's time for Chicagoans to admit that we love our thieves. Not
only do we partake of the economic bounty that they provide, but also
the myth and legend that inspires our lives. Mayor Richard M. Daley is
perhaps nothing more than a reflection of the highest aspirations of
Chicago.
As the mayor goes, so goes the future of Bridgeport. When Daley
passes, the neighborhood will experience a slow devolution. They call
Chicago the city that works, but in reality it's the city of "You'll
take it and like it." When you're raised in Bridgeport, and indeed in
most wards of the city, you are told when to vote and who to vote for.
We live in a democratic dictatorship of sorts with virtually zero
political representation. The biggest problem faced today in Iraq is in
trying to instill democratic values into a people that have no
understanding of democracy. This will be the problem that Chicagoans
will face, especially Bridgeporters, when Daley is gone. People will
have to learn to make choices. This will be especially difficult for
Bridgeport Magaffers: coming from a world of predetermination into a
world of free choice will be terrifying. Some of these guys might even
have to go to work. The city and even Bridgeport itself will be up for
grabs, open to an open political process. But if democracy can take hold
in Iraq, it can also take hold in Chicago. But as sure as we live, Daley
will be gone one day. My father says that, like it or not, the city is
going to have to learn how to make an honest buck and stand on its own
two feet, and the non-work ethic will be replaced by survival of the
fittest.
Also by Chinatown Frankie P
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |