|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Viva Africa Academy Award-winner Gavin Hood's "Tsotsi"
"Tsotsi," an adaptation of South African writer Athol Fugard's novel,
an Academy Award-winner on Sunday night, is a showcase for two other
bright talents: actor Presley Chweneyagae and writer-director Gavin
Hood.
Set in a Johannesburg shantytown, Fugard's 1961 novel (only published
in 1980) tells the story of a nameless, orphaned 19-year-old, known only
as "Tsotsi," or "thug," who denies any trace of his past. In the
movie's earliest moments, Tsotsi's angry present roils, and he and a
trio of friends explode into violence; a carjacking lands a baby in
Tsotsi's lap. Despite the chance for horrifying sentimentality, Hood's
movie is an eye-opener, both visually and with Chweneyagae's intense
performance, a compelling, suggestive story that's both lyrical and
jagged. As he asserted with the Oscar in his hand, "Viva Africa!"
The South African director read the book while at UCLA studying film.
"I thought, wow, this would really make a good movie whilst not
realizing what a struggle it actually is. It's very much about what goes
on in the mind of Tsotsi and the episodic nature of the characters he
encounters. I put it out of my mind and went back to South Africa and
started off making what we called educational dramas in the townships,
making stories about HIV. And then I made a short film called "The
Storekeeper," which won the Silver Hugo [in Chicago], and that helped
get me finance for my first feature film."
There's a time-capsule quality to the novel's publication: Fugard
wrote it in 1961 or so, tucked it away, and it wasn't published until
1980 or so. But the story is played both contemporary and timeless. In
the shocking opening scenes, Hood almost uses Fugard's prose as
storyboards, such as the tumult of weather, of lightning storms over
Cape Town, in Fugard's words, "the torn and brooding sky." Still, his
ending is more optimistic than his forebear's. "There are lots of
reasons, one of which is that you want the audience to have something to
discuss, and [if the more pessimistic ending were used] it's closed and
there's nothing to discuss."
"With young writing students recently, I was asked, `How do you work
the adaptation?' And I said if you think you have to turn the novel into
the film, you get in trouble. What most people remember about a great
piece of literature is how it made them feel. They remember the
emotional response; they don't necessarily remember the damn plot six
months later or even one week later. They remember that there was an
emotion that it generated in them. What became my obligation was, can I
capture that emotional essence and use different tools? No, I can't tell
you what's going on in his head, but I can show you, without shifting
the camera around a lot, what he's thinking if I have an actor and I
work the beats out and I keep the eyelines tight-to-lens so you're
really given the chance to look behind the eyes as opposed to being
off-angle on the facial shots. I sometimes had them with their heads up
against the lens if they weren't on camera. I'd be saying to you, play
to this eye, so you're a flick away from the audience. So it's all
what's happening in the eyes.
"And by the way? This kid has played Hamlet. This is a guy who comes
from these areas, but from the age of 6, was going down to his community
theater, community center where they did theater, and just loved it. And
his mum wanted him to because it kept him off the streets. My costume
director saw him playing Hamlet at the State Theater in a production,
said this kid is unbelievable. So you have this actor who's capable of
coming to grips with flawed characters, characters with a certain amount
of self-loathing, vulnerability. My role was just to help him transition
that from theater into the film medium and let him trust his moments of
stillness."
Hood's dynamic use of widescreen is impressive as well. There's a cut
he has from one child sheltering from the rain at night, nestled in a
round cement culvert tile, and then you cut to the wider shot and there
are so many more tiles, so many more kids, like a James Nachtwey photo
of children playing in wartime. "Well, I'll tell you the weird thing. I
have a stills background. I have the theater background because my
parents were actors when they were young. But my dad's other passion was
wildlife photography. Sometimes when I was young I hated it, because
we'd be stuck in the heat in the car in the wilderness, waiting for some
elephant to turn its head to catch the light just right in its eye. My
father's point was always, the stills frame is about composition,
lighting and grabbing an emotional moment. If you don't have that
emotional moment, you just have a recording of something, you don't have
a life, you don't have a soul. When you catch that moment, whatever it
is, whether it be a lizard or an elephant or a human being that just
catches you, that's what makes it." "Tsotsi" opens Friday.
Also by Ray Pride Union Label
Tip of the Week
Why "Why We Fight"
Tip of the Week
Tip of the Week
Lonesome Crackhead
Humanism's face
Tip of the Week
Suddenly Sundance
Tip of the Week
Doll Parts
Tip of the Week
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |