|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Up "Wolf's Creek" Without a battle
Most writers about movies cling to convenient myths. One is that
marketers might mind a bad review now and again.
"Wolf Creek," aka "The Aussie Chainsaw Massacre," is less a movie
than a mechanism, more a money-spinner than a moral offense. Calculated
in its mix of Australian walkabout fables like Peter Weir's "Picnic at
Hanging Rock" (1975) and the brutality pioneered by 1974's "The Texas
Chainsaw Massacre," the début writing-directing-producing slasher
effort by Greg McLean, "based on actual events," wrought a rare
zero-star review from Roger Ebert on its cynical, mocking Christmas Day
opening. Ebert asked, "What the hell is the purpose of this sadistic
celebration of pain and cruelty?"
Um. Financial gain for the Dimension Films division of the upstart
Weinstein Company? There's a wealth, or shall we say, poverty of
youth-slaking horror product coming up, such as Eli Roth's Quentin
Tarantino-hosted "Hostel" or the inexplicable Uwe Boll's
"Bloodrayne," both opening next week, but "Wolf Creek" is another
matter, with its mean, minimalist evocations of fear visited on a trio
of young innocents captured by Outback yokels, shocks that cascade into
explicit and sustained torture, for its characters and by extension, its
audience. McLean, a director of commercials, is obviously a student of
horror, from moments that are suggestive and many that are brutal, but
does "Wolf Creek" stake out new territory or piss on new ground?
No. There is a cold fury at work in a movie like John McNaughton's
"Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer" (1986) or a black comic sense of
nightmare in "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (1974). "Texas Chainsaw"
was affectionately nicknamed "Saw" by director Tobe Hooper and writer
Kim Henkel, which inspired a different, clammy horror series three
decades later. Hooper and Henkel and company were onto something then
that McLean is well aware of now: daylight can be as fearful as the
dark.
But there is another kind of darkness here: The current issue of the
politically oriented film quarterly Cineaste convenes a "critical
symposium" on "international film criticism today," and Argentina's
Quintin (aka Eduardo Antin), writes that movie criticism ought to
contain "discovery, illumination, kindness, passion, freedom, elegance,
humor, independence, knowledge, irreverence." Yes, as should the movies
we see that we say you should see.
Yet as failed movie producer Peter Guber has repeated for decades,
again and again, and always with great gusto, "It's not show show, it's
show business." Some may find the landscapes of "Wolf Creek,"
based on the "Backpacker Murders" committed along an isolated stretch
of highway between 1989 and 1992, and the film's canny use of off-screen
portent a valid fright. Yet even with all the nastiness, there's more
meta than meat here, especially with the cool calculation of unspooling
a brutal provocation like this at a theater near you on Christmas Day
after ham and pie and into the happy holidays that follow.
This surly, curdled, profitable mass of antisocial ambitions, an
under $1 million-budgeted notebook of deeply disturbing misanthropy in
the form of inventive misoygnies, is the first release of Dimension
Pictures not under the Disney banner, but as part of the complexly
financed independent, the Weinstein Company. In the money-spinning
tradition of the "Scream"s and "Scary Movie"s and "Sin City,"
"Wolf Creek" continues the financially remunerative mix of horror and
awards-friendly "quality" that made the original Miramax
possible--junk and bunkum pay the freight for the prestige pics. (The
most cynical way to look at it is that The Weinstein Company is the
Classics division of a company called Dimension.)
Dimension's 2004 stocking snuffer was a re-edited version of a
long-shelved Spanish horror title released as "Darkness," which snuck
up onto multiplex marquees for a $6 million opening and a tasty final
$22 million; "Wolf Creek"'s reported opening gross is $6.1 million.
The Weinstein Company has more art-house-friendly entries like "The
Matador," "Mrs. Henderson Presents," and "Transamerica," as well as
the animated "Hoodwinked," all of which had 2005 release patterns at
one point, but which were, for most of America, pushed into 2006 only in
the past couple of weeks. Like their predecessor version of Miramax,
this kind of calculation is part of the pattern: keep 'em jumping.
Post-Christmas also comes the report that Chen Kaige's newest epic,
the $42-million "The Promise," after a record-breaking opening in
China, is to be released by the Weinstein Company with an Anthony
Minghella-penned "preface" appended and, it's rumored, to be cut by
twenty minutes. The rivulets of money divined from feats of commerce
like "Wolf Creek" make this possible, too. "Wolf Creek" opened Christmas Day. Ho-ho-ho.
Also by Ray Pride All gone
Tip of the Week
Holiday Movie Preview
Raise the Red Kimono
Tip of the Week
What does it mean?
Tip of the Week
It's a blunder-filled life
Tip of the Week
Born to Rent
Tip of the Week
The one you're looking for
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |