|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() The picture gets small Ray Pride on the Chicago Film Festival's tiny but vital movies
"I am big, the pictures got small."
Billy Wilder put those words in the mouth of Norma Desmond in
"Sunset Boulevard," and they're getting smaller still, in a way that
the acerbic Wilder might not have understood.
Festivals like Sundance, Slamdance and Chicago Underground have, in
the past few years, embraced a smaller form of filmmaking, often rough,
sometimes ragged, mingling techniques of documentary and fiction while
also bringing the camera discomfortingly close to one's friends. The
2005 Chicago International Film Festival (CIFF) has a sturdy selection
of this kind of movie, with choices like Joe Angio's "How to Eat Your
Watermelon in White Company (And Enjoy It)," Mark Levin's "Protocols
of Zion" and, particularly, two Chicago-rooted projects, Joe Swanberg's
"Kissing on the Mouth" and Danielle Beverly's "Learning to Swallow."
When Michael Kutza began CIFF 41 years ago, a just-out-of-college
graphic designer, his first honoree was Norma D. herself, Gloria
Swanson. It was a different world and a different festival then; this
year, a request to the festival's press office to talk to Kutza about
the journey from glamour to grit got no reply by press time. Later in
the 1960s, a dynamo named Melvin van Peebles, born on the South Side in
1932, made a movie called "Sweet Sweetback's Baadassssss Song." Like
CIFF, he's still unstoppable at 72, and in the criminally entertaining
"How to Eat," Angio, also Chicago-born and trained, now
editor-in-chief of Time Out New York, vividly encapsulates the drive of
this renaissance motherfucker: you understand how "indie" was born, as
much as how van Peebles fathered contemporary black movies.
But what can be done today? Technology makes it possible to be a
wizard or a fool on your own terms, in your own time. Both "Kissing on
the Mouth" and "Learning to Swallow" suggest that if everyone with
the energy can make a film, films will be made about people you know,
and about people who are like the people you know.
"Learning to Swallow" held pitfalls for me on a first viewing. I've
known director Danielle Beverly for a long time, and its subject, Patsy
Desmond, I've known for sixteen years. My dread upon hearing of its
production was a more ominous reaction than the one I had to last fall's
sensationalistic cover profile of Patsy in the Reader, which presented a
journalist's set of shards after the fact, or my own stab last June at
writing a modest item about the opening of Desmond's now-defunct
Humboldt Park gallery for Newcity. The sorts of questions I've asked
documentary filmmakers, and had to ask the collaborators whom I've
worked with myself, all erupt painfully in the face of this film.
I can't tell you if "Learning to Swallow" is good or not, and
wouldn't put myself in the position of reviewing it, but Beverly's
documentary evokes questions that matter to me in the evolving state of
film making. In the press kit, Beverly writes, "She was the girl who
was friends with every band, who worked at the coolest hipster places,
who was at every rock show dancing wildly." "Learning" comes
afterwards, however, four years in Desmond's life after a suicide
attempt with drain cleaner that destroyed her digestive system, tracking
her coming to terms with her artistic ambition as a photographer (with
much of her work previously unseen), her family, her increasing weakness
and her previously undiagnosed bipolar illness. Beverly's camera is
unflinching, and the mix of confusion, pain and, sometimes,
self-delusion on the part of her central figure--her friend--is
distressing.
Desmond is nothing if not keen on attention. "I started shooting
pretty quickly after gaining Patsy's permission," Beverly says. "I'm
attracted to dramatic, unfolding stories, watching a process and the
transformation of a subject. So there was no time to sit back and try to
get funding, or to conceptualize the entire film. I just jumped right
in." Following the cinema vérité examples she admires, Beverly says she
worked not to plan anything. "I felt it important to keep an open mind
and simply observe. And to keep my mouth shut!" the ebullient director
says, adding, "Which is not an easy thing for me."
Mouth shut, eyes open, Beverly says, "I could have never predicted
what Patsy would go through: a surgery that attempted to restore her
digestive system, her road to physical and emotional recovery, the
amazing people she met along the way, and finally her profound
reconnection with her artistic self. I did hope Patsy would fulfill her
desire to make it back to Chicago, and in that sense, that plan
did come to fruition. But I did not have an agenda for how the story
would unfold, only that I would follow it until a natural end."
Is it possible to get too close? "I don't really think about
distance as a concept I should adhere to. I'm a filmmaker, not a
journalist. I just try to bear truthful witness to the situation I'm
filming. To listen and be watchful. I'm not afraid of human pain and
am actually continually drawn to it as a documentary subject--the
incredible pain of living."
While now in New York after several years in San Francisco, Chicago
remains key to her work. "My time living in Chicago, particularly in
Wicker Park in the early nineties, had a huge influence." She studied
at the School of the Art Institute and later attended grad school at
Columbia. "Music and art were all around me in Wicker Park. I put
myself through school by working at Reckless Records, Earwax and Dusty
Groove. My boyfriend Eric was making music videos and experimental film
with his company H-Gun. Everyone I knew was doing something interesting!
Actually I met practically everyone I know from Chicago through Patsy.
She was there in the center of the scene."
That scene, however, remains off-screen in "Learning," and
audiences witness a different story, a different figure. "I'm finding
that women respond to the film in an intensely visceral way. Although
Patsy's experience is singular, it also has universality in its
portrayal of one person's resilience, redemption and self-acceptance."
"It's not an easy film," she says with understatement. "It is
highly intimate and at times quite dark. It's a documentary and you
can't change what happened to make it more palatable. I don't believe
in soft-pedaling the truth." Without readily available affordable equipment, "Kissing" wouldn't
exist. "I could not have justified borrowing money from friends or
family to make this," Swanberg says. "If I didn't already own a
camera and a computer with editing software, there would have been no
impetus to start this project. I've never been one to glamorize going
into debt in order to follow your creative vision. I'm a lot more
practical than that. I'm also practical about the challenge it would be
for a distributor to release a film like this. It doesn't stop me from
getting frustrated that there aren't many brave souls on the
distribution end of the business, but I totally understand the hesitancy
to take a risk with such a small film."
Swanberg is alert as well to other possibilities in a system that
perhaps does not yet exist. "What it's going to do is force filmmakers
to release their own work, or it will create a lot of much smaller video
distributors that function a lot more like record labels. The
indie-music world manages to release a shitload of records every year,
and just as many bands go on tour, and there seems to be the
infrastructure to support that. Nobody makes any money, but it allows
the bands to keep making music." Sounding like a young van Peebles,
Swanberg continues, "Film is going to start following that model a lot
more closely. Filmmakers are going to have to hit the road together,
booking spaces and charging admission, selling beer, selling T-shirts
and DVDs, and providing a face-to-face experience that the multiplex
can't offer. With a lot of these smaller films, it makes total sense to
create a more intimate and friendly viewing experience than the
traditional theater experience can offer. With `Kissing,' we're still
talking with some of the more conventional distribution companies, but I
can only wait so long before I just want to get it out there myself.
I'll probably see what happens with my next film, and if no distributor
wants it, then I'll consider trying to tour with both films and selling
them myself."
Swanberg's keen on how other filmmakers sell themselves, too. "I
have a lot of influences, but it's usually not because of the films,
but rather the personalities of the filmmakers. I love Werner Herzog,
though I don't know his films all that well. He's absolutely an
influence. I've had the pleasure of being in a room with him and
listening to him talk a few times, and his discussions are always
influential. The same is true of Barbet Schroeder. I've probably only
seen about half of his films, but the stories about him, and his
interviews, are extremely influential." "Mary Ellen Mark's `Streetwise' was a huge influence," she adds,
alluding to one of the more wrenching movies ever made by a fine-art
photographer. "I remember being ripped apart by that film, leaving the
theater and realizing for the first time how a documentary was different
from a narrative film. All the films of the Maysles Brothers, and the
exuberance of Albert Maysles in particular, have been very motivating.
Barbara Kopple too, especially her perseverance and conviction."
Beverly resists filmmaking that reveals the presence of the filmmaker.
"Many, many people encouraged me to put myself in the documentary
because of my relationship with Patsy. But it seemed preposterous! Why
would I need to be in the documentary when there was so much going on in
front of the camera? It kind of drives me nuts when filmmakers feel
compelled to insert themselves into their own film. Isn't the person
they are filming interesting enough to watch? Because if they aren't,
maybe they should be filming something different."
But Beverly returns to the more measured gaze: "Probably the
greatest influence on me was, and still is, documentary photography.
Danny Lyon, Nan Goldin and Larry Clark all made groundbreaking work by
photographing the people in their own lives. They did it in a profoundly
intimate manner, by training their camera on folks who were at their
most vulnerable, and living through their darkest moments. And the
results were transcendent."
Also by Ray Pride Oliver's Twist
Tip of the Week
Tip of the Week
Family way
Arms and the Man
Tip of the Week
Sympathy for the possessed
Tip of the Week
Fall Forward: Film
Tip of the Week
The Politics of Love
Tip of the Week
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |