|
|
|
bars & clubs restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Click for words events Rush Hour Salman Rushdie sounds off
In the last decade Americans have watched dumbfounded as the Cold War
evolved into the War on Terror. How did this happen? Why did it happen?
And who is to blame? Perhaps the most qualified novelist in the world to
address these questions is 58-year-old Salman Rushdie--Indian by way of
Pakistan and boarding school in England, Rushdie is a quintessential
East-West soul. Born into a secular Muslim household, he experienced the
wrath of Islamic fundamentalism in 1989 when Ayatollah Khomeini put a
bounty on his head for the perceived slights against Muslims in his
comic novel, "Satanic Verses." It's been several years since this death sentence was sort of lifted
and Rushdie has managed to keep the focus in his work on the power of
storytelling, not politics. The same goes for his latest novel,
"Shalimar the Clown," which wraps a story about one man's
radicalization into a larger meditation on the dangers of shape-shifting
in our present age. Ever the chameleon himself, Rushdie lives in New
York and London these days. NEWCITY: One of my favorite details in this new novel is the feast
called "36 courses minimum," prepared by chefs in Kashmir. Is there
really such a thing? SR: I'm afraid there is. You eat it and then you recover for a year.
There is also a banquet - and the real name of that is super-wazwan,
which is even more food. NEWCITY: It's sort of funny to read about this cuisine and then fast
forward to Europe in the wake of World War II: it packs quite the
cultural jetlag. Do you ever have to research details like this or does
it come naturally? SR: One of my good fortune as a writer is to have access to a lot of
traditions - and not just in inside Western culture, high culture or low
culture - remember I am a child of the `60s generation, I was 21 in
1968, I am also somebody who is passionately in love with the language
of cinema, so all this stuff, music, movies, food, it's just readily
available - not something I have to bone up on. NEWCITY: Do you have any guilty pleasure reading habits? SR: I love Elmore Leonard - but other than that I don't read a lot
of genre fiction, because it becomes by nature formulaic. NEWCITY: But you must admire the page-turning ability of today's
popular writers: one of the striking things about your work is that you
entertain (and entertain complexity) at the same time. Have these things
always been mutually exclusive? SR: Well, one of the things that happened in the wake of modernism is
that you wound up with popular fiction which told great page-turning
stories, but had no other qualities. And you had the so-called literary
novel, which had all those other virtues, but didn't tell a story. NEWCITY: As someone who has had a very personal relationship to
extremism, did you think twice about empathizing--and entertaining--with
a killer like Shalimar? Did you ever step back and think, `How can I
possibly care for this guy? He's a monster.' SR: When I am not writing a book, when it's just me sitting around,
that is how I would think. But when you are in the act of writing the
book--you are not in the book, but inside your characters. Asking
questions: how can I create a certain atmosphere? How can I render this
scene? That kind of question--it occurs the second you stop. NEWCITY: Early press has billed this as a novel about extremism,
which seems rather reductive given the way you marinate each character
in their past. SR: I rather regret that kind of simplification--I mean, there is the
title character who does become a man of violence, but what I thought I
was writing about...was the importance of various kinds of loving
relationships, and the way in which when those relationships are strong,
differences can be bridged, and when they break down, what the
consequences of that may be. NEWCITY: Since you are in London now, I was wondering if you could
tell me about how it feels there in the wake of the July bombings. SR: It's very strange. I'm very concerned. If there was a third
attack the backlash could be absolutely horrendous. Already there is
some anecdotal that crimes against Muslims has increased exponentially. NEWCITY: Blair has proposed kicking out certain clerics "who preach
hate." Do you agree with this? SR: I think it's important that there should be a response from
within--in the mosques I mean. And there is some evidence that will
happen. But taking off my liberal hat for a second, one of the things
England has made a mistake of was letting in all these extreme radical
groups over the years. The theory being that it meant London wouldn't
get attacked. And now it seems like the government [agrees]. That being
the case, you just have to be cautious of whether the government is
over-applying such a policy. NEWCITY: It seems a fine balance--in New York you were on the stump
for literary open-mindedness, hosting the festival for international
literature as president of PEN (Poets, Essayist, Writers). Why choose
New York as the venue? SR: It's something I very much wanted to do: to stress the
international aspect of literature. One of the shocking statistics is
how few books are published in translation in America. In European
countries it's around fifteen or sixteen percent; even in England it's
close to ten percent. In America it's just three percent. Unfortunately,
this means that Americans don't have an opportunity to find out about
the best stuff in the rest of the world.
Also by John Freeman Nonfiction Review
About Face
Fiction Review
Superhero
What I'm reading this summer
Nonfiction Review
Family Guy
Nonfiction Review
Versatility
Fiction Review
Fiction Review
Fiction Review
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |