|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Holiday Movie Preview Great Men and the Men Who Love Them: 'Tis the season of the biopic
Some men are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have
greatness thrust upon them. -"Twelfth Night," Shakespeare And others, long dead, have an Oliver Stone movie made about them,
keeping all the second-rate wigmakers of northern African in expense
money. (Colin Farrell seems lost in "Alexander" for the general
affability he radiates, not quite embodying the sort of megalomaniac who
wakes up in the morning, touches himself and smiles, "Oh! I'm still
Oliver Stone!")
Be not afraid of greatness, but be afraid of movies made about great
men by successful directors who've found creatures of industry to
finance their fascinations. Thanksgiving is the time for turkey, and
Christmas, especially with the telescoped awards season begun last year
when the Academy Awards were moved forward a month, has become a time of
stuffed goose: movies that would not exist without a director with a
"vision," an actor with fire in the belly, and a script about a
powerful historical figure with peculiar flaws and, in most cases, a
very rich man whose career began in another field who wants greatness to
rub off. Hollywood's latter-day version of Greek drama seems to be the
tableau of a talented director, or veteran journeyman, erecting, then
demolishing, the great man who's obsessed them for years. But who's
behind the artistes with the fixation on inventing their own version of
the great man? Men with millions or billions who want to associate with
the great men who love the great men.
The genre of the biopic, for these reasons, seems increasingly
fertile--this year's output includes "Alexander," "The Motorcycle
Diaries," "Kinsey," "Finding Neverland," "The Sea Inside,"
"Beyond the Sea," and next year, perhaps, Renee Zellweger's Janis
Joplin and Joaquin Phoenix's Johnny Cash. Are they more than a hall of
mirrors of what professional narcissists hold great in others, while
reflecting mostly themselves?
With "Ray," Jamie Foxx has the proverbial role of a lifetime, a
performance inhabiting Ray Charles' rebellious imagination all the way
down to the fingertips. Taylor Hackford says he wanted to make the movie
for sixteen years, telling CNN "the story of Ray Charles is the world
underestimating him." (This, from the director whose last movie was the
terminally sluggish "Proof of Life.") How did it finally get made?
According to Agence France-Presse, thanks to a single investor: a Ray
Charles fan from Colorado who coughed up $35 million. For all but a
handful of men, it could be the direst of disaster, or the first in a
succession of immense bankruptcies.
Kevin Spacey's wanted to bodysnatch singer Bobby Darin for years,
despite now being substantially older than Darin, dead at 37, with
Spacey, at 45, putting up a chunk of his own money and shooting much of
the movie in Germany in order to take advantage of money from a local
producer.
It would be cynical to say that Martin Scorsese wanted to make
"Kundun" so that his own worldly work might shine brighter in
association with the Dalai Lama, but "The Aviator" presents a more
intriguing case study. Working from a script prepared by director
Michael Mann with screenwriter John Logan (he of the very fictional
making-of-"Citizen Kane" HBO movie, "RKO 281") for Leonardo DiCaprio
(with whom Mann had also failed to produce a James Dean biography),
Martin Scorsese takes on the legend of Howard Hughes. Hughes, a man
whose mania led him to famously assert that he wanted to be the best
flyer, the best golfer, the best lover, the best filmmaker ever.
The thrilling opening of "The Aviator" is rife with the love of
filmmaking, as Scorsese & Co. depict the making of Hughes' own
"Heaven's Gate," the World War I aerial epic, "Hell's Angels"
(1930). Scorsese's love of cinema past is reflected mostly in the
movie's muddy-colored palette, aping early versions of Technicolor's
bloom. But as the movie foreshadows Hughes' eventual decline into
obsessive-compulsive isolation, you wonder who the movie is for, beyond
its makers? That is, beyond overseas producer Initial Entertainment
Group (also on hand for "Ali" and "Gangs of New York"), or Germany's
Intermedia Films, hoping to conquer the known world of distribution by
ponying up a huge chunk of "Alexander"'s likely unknowable budget.
It's a recipe for reflecting what's on screen, paranoia mingling
dangerously with megalomania, or Psych 101 invocations of the Oedipus
conflict, killing two daddies with one stone--the big guy on screen and
Daddy Warbucks back in the production office. With vanity in play, the
projects might be less tidy than a well-made bit of fiction, more
largesse than finesse.
And speaking of big guys and the biggest of biopics, of course, we've
got "The Passion of the Christ," which, for convoluted reasons, could
not be called "The Passion," director-producer-financier Mel Gibson's
preferred title for his keening, slashing portrait of his savior, a
bloodier vision of his own self-image in movies where he howls at the
edge of sanity and hope, as in the first "Lethal Weapon."
Plus, all sorts of snotty surmises have been made about "Fahrenheit
9/11," Michael Moore's anti-hagiography of George W. Bush and his
family's murky timeline, spearheaded by Miramax big Harvey Weinstein, a
major rumbler himself as well as Democratic supporter and contributor,
who would not be shy about taking the scalp of a sitting president.
(Miramax's own 2004 biopic, the prissy "Finding Neverland" is a
mid-budget feat of production and costume design rather than an
illumination of why a grown man might want to always remain a boy.)
Compare all these to some of the year's best fiction, a film like
Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor's "Sideways," an adaptation of a novel
but with a beating melancholy heart about hope that can last beyond the
first defeats of middle age; Clint Eastwood's flinty "Million Dollar
Baby" (written by Paul Haggis), an astonishing, and astonishingly spare
miniature about love and regret, one of the best movies by the
74-year-old director; or Joshua Marston's "Maria Full of Grace," where
emotional authenticity resides alongside scrupulous research; of Pedro
Almodovar's post-noir puzzle-box, "Bad Education," which nests levels
and levels of his own blurred biography with a dozen other personal
fixations. Movies about life, and lives lived, transformed by art,
perspective, by the use of camera, music, the notion of personal (rather
than collective) memory, and by simple imagination. (Even Eastwood had
to resort to an angel when Warners balked, with an investment by
Chicago's own well-heeled Tom Rosenberg ("The Hurricane," "The
Gift").
The biopic is a rickety thing, a feat of contraction, kind of a
cheat, filled with dramatic truncations and psychological reductionism.
("Come here Watson! I need you!") Ray Charles or Howard Hughes or
Bobby Darin or Alexander-the-not-so-Great: these are lives well lived
but for dramatic purposes, too true to be good. And if we know the
figure, the actors, no matter how gifted ("And the Oscar goes to...
Jamie Foxx")--are playing games with the subjective memories of
sentimental viewers. (Cate Blanchett's Katherine Hepburn in "The
Aviator" is glorious, likely because she's giddily playing an actress
whose manner starts at caricature and barks upward from there.)
An actor wants to be that man's man. And a man with money to burn
wants that budget's reflected light to flame across a thousand or three
screens and then upon the Kodak Theatre stage come February 27. All hail
the campfire of the vanities!
Also by Ray Pride Tip of the Week
Tip of the Week
DVD Tips
Type ADD
Tip of the Week
Ordinary people
Short takes
Off Camera
DVD Tips
Home alone
DVD Tips
The gift of reality
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |