|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() L.A. confidence Clark Johnson's "S.W.A.T." is a down-to-earth thriller
I never thought I'd live to see the day when thrills in a studio movie
would come from sheer competence.
The offhanded glories of a movie like, say, Walter Hill's "Long
Riders" caught at an early morning showing at the Loop's defunct United
Artists, seem a distant memory. Still, genre work is not dead, and I'm
pretty sure it was more than the 10am screening with a fistful of Dr.
Pepper that made "S.W.A.T." such authentic fun.
Reluctantly looking over the list of movies I've seen outside of film
festivals since the start of the year, I've found more titles than not
of movies I never care to see even a frame of again. Who's got the
miscalibrated meds, you have to wonder: the executives at the top of the
media pyramid, or audiences who are shocked giddy-senseless when
something remarkable like "Finding Nemo" finds its way to shore?
A shaggy-dog shambles like "Hollywood Homicide" has its vagrant
charm; a neutron bomb like "Gigli"--when it goes off, everything goes
down but the stars' salary quotes--makes you wonder if anyone way up top
of the industry really knows what movies once looked like, and what life
looks like outside of the Town Car. A director I interviewed this week
told me about a recent insulting meeting with a studio executive; the
director said laughter was the only proper response, followed by, "Do
you think I've never been insulted before?"
No, he doesn't know; he only greenlights a series of compromises that
serve to sate the maw of the
theatrical-overseas-DVD-pay-per-view-cable-basic-cable pipeline. Movies
like "Hulk" are misshapen for other reasons: Universal "couldn't"
preview the picture before audiences to gauge their reaction because of
potential bad, pseudonymous-signed reviews that wind up on the likes of
Ain't It Cool News. Result: ambitious yet slack movie that could have
benefited from a few extra sets of eyes. (And still, "Hulk" was victim
to one of the nastier, stupider piratings of the year.)
"S.W.A.T." sounds like a rotten idea: a "remake" of a shabby
television series that hardly anyone recalls with any particular
affection. Yet "S.W.A.T." is gratifying from the opening shot, which
zooms into and beyond the Hollywood sign with a flotilla of helicopters,
blending the impact of the first few seconds of "Star Wars," "Blade
Runner" and the ending of Kiyoshi Kurosawa's "Charisma." Enter Colin
Farrell in a `copter, looking like he's digesting a glass of milk. A
bank is being attacked by suicidal if well-financed dumbasses; enter the
commando coppers.
Clark Johnson shows himself not just as a director to watch, but
someone whose movies move. Johnson's television background, which
includes directing episodes of F/X's "The Shield" and HBO's "The
Wire" and "Boycott," which he also starred in, brings so much to
"S.W.A.T." Everything said about the maturity of television versus
what we cavalierly call "contemporary American cinema" is on screen,
plus an uncommon attention to performance. Johnson shoots in a kinetic
fashion that must have driven the accountants mad, working with a sweet
surfeit of coverage, cameras in unexpected places, booming up and down,
rushing forward or back, editing for maximum impact. It's a focused
version of the incoherent energy of John Moore's "Behind Enemy
Lines." Johnson knows how to utilize the moving camera, unlike say,
Michael Bay, who pretty consistently swoops laterally, Steadicam-ing to
the left, low and fast. The production design is rich without becoming
distracting, with graceful detailing in almost every frame.
But that is look and pace. The actors aren't just having fun, they're
doing topnotch work without too much of a wink. Farrell seems the best
he's been, truly holding the screen; when he's paired later with
old-school S.W.A.T.-Yoda Samuel L. Jackson, even Jackson's performance
is rich without becoming risible. Among other team members, LL Cool J
impresses; Olivier Martinez makes for a swell pretty-boy antagonist; and
Michelle Rodriguez... The camera loves her. Why don't more casting
directors? What Johnson gets out of her in reaction shots is terrific,
underlining that she is a hardcore screen-stealing cholita goddess.
There's a scene where she enters a room and seeing a three-way
testosterone tangle in progress, and she reacts with a slightly
skeptical yet still amused raise of the eyebrow.
The script credited to David Ayer ("Training Day") and David
McKenna ("American History X") sets rules so that even the most
implausible of turns--a Lear Jet landing on the deco Sixth Avenue Bridge
in downtown Los Angeles? --is worked through in a satisfying way. The
action is exquisitely calibrated, but throughout, Johnson knows that
genre is not junk to be condescended to, it is a series of variations on
themes and figures.
There's always a line of bull in interviews and press kits about
"y'know, the city was another character in our movie"--Martin Brest
made said claim about the drab, darting "Gigli"--but Johnson, in his
own impatient fashion, is just as gifted at capturing Los Angeles' grit
and glitter as Michael Mann in movies such as "Heat." Dawn, day,
night, actual locations, studied interiors, street scenes. "S.W.A.T."
talks the talk, and "S.W.A.T." walks the walk. "S.W.A.T." opens Friday.
Also by Ray Pride Tip of the Week
The Oh No show
Short Runs
Tip of the Week
Leaving Navy Pier
Extras, extras
Short Runs
Tip of the Week
Short Runs
Michael Bay: Reloaded
Text and texture
Tip of the Week
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |