|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() The day the clown cried Capturing the Kafkaesque fate of a suburban family
Andrew Jarecki met an angry clown and decided it would make a nice short
documentary.
The clown, David Friedman, is New York's most successful party clown
for
children. Jarecki, 40, studied film at Princeton (as had his brother
Eugene, whose "The Trials of Henry Kissinger" was released in 2002),
and had co-written and performed the theme song to the WB series
"Felicity." Until "Capturing the Friedmans," his highest public
profile came from co-founding MovieFone, the 1998 sale of which to AOL
netted him a nine-figure return (and the ability to relocate to Rome
with his family).
"Why is this man so angry?" Jarecki said he asked himself. It took
three years to find out why, and the result, "Capturing the Friedmans"
is a crisp rendition of a convoluted horror story, of guilt, public
scorn and the nature of truth itself. In the late 1980s, Arnold Friedman
was an award-winning schoolteacher in Great Neck, Long Island. With his
wife, Elaine, he raised three boys. He was an "early-adopter,"
teaching computer science to students after hours in the family home. In
1987, their quiet Thanksgiving dinner is interrupted by a police raid,
and Arnold and his 18-year-old son Jesse are arrested and led away in
handcuffs in front of a phalanx of TV news reporters. They're accused
of
a terrible crime, and the charges only grow, leading to an indictment
for hundreds of offenses. The revelations shock throughout, to the very
end of the film. But the revelations aren't all about the
Friedmans--it's also about detectives, lawyers and the scorching
contempt of a suburban community. (At the risk of seeming coy, I'll
note
that other reviews will spell out precisely what turns the narrative
takes, but it seems best to discover the power of Jarecki and his editor
Richard Hankin and other collaborators' intent craft for yourself.)
Jarecki eventually got Friedman to talking, which got other members of
his family talking, which led to the documentary that won the Grand Jury
prize at Sundance this year. Most great docs have some form of kismet
motoring them ahead: Jarecki not only lucked into remarkable material,
he knew how to handle the three-year journey that brought it to Sundance
(and a relatively rapid theatrical release via Magnolia Pictures and
HBO).
There are moments of intense emotions. "A few years ago," Jarecki
says, "Before I really understood the depth of the Friedman story, I
first interview Elaine, who is the mother of the family. At one point I
had asked her a question, and she drifted off for a moment, sort of lost
in a memory. Then she stopped herself, saying, `I don't know. I--I
can't
say too much about it. We were a family.' The idea of a woman in her
seventies speaking about her own family in the past tense was strikingly
sad. I didn't know how this family had ceased to be a family, but I was
determined to understand it. It was that phrase, `We were a family,'
that stayed with me and drove me to do the work, to learn the story, to
spend time with the family and to get to know them."
Late in the process, Jarecki discovered that David had large library
videotapes of the family. With this footage, it is almost as if we're
seeing Kafka's version of "The Osbournes." The footage includes
journal entries to himself where he rages tearfully about what the
family had done to itself and what the community had visited upon them.
Family dinners, including a Seder that took place after the indictments,
in which the camera sits, another family member, unnoticed, as terrible
recriminations are thrown around the table. Home movies aren't usually
this bitter. Their home movies are different, Jarecki says, because of
"the kind of material they chose to capture. While most families use
home movies just to document special happy celebrations like birthdays,
this family never turned the camera off. Even after the police showed up
and their lives began to change forever. They filmed their most intimate
moments, their most intense and private moments." There are several
heartbreaking passages of home movies shot on film three generations
earlier. "Starting with 8mm films, the family documented itself
incessantly. Seeing their story unfold from inside the film provides a
level of intimacy that hasn't really been present in films in the
past."
It's an amazing piece of work, and the New Yorker's David Denby made a
superb case for it being a masterpiece. I'm not sure I can go that far
without a second viewing, but it is a haunting, masterful work that
matters. "On a philosophical level," Jarecki says, "the film is about
the elusive nature of truth; how our memories evolve over time to suit
our needs; memories of our family; memories of our parents; members of
things we've done or felt we had to do in our lives or our work. It's
also about the nature of family and of society; what we owe each other
as members of a family and of a community." "Capturing the Friedmans" opens Friday at Landmark Century.
Also by Ray Pride Tip of the Week
Short Runs
Cool work
Sloppy firsts
Short Runs
The Woo of art
Spin control
Summer Film 2003
Summer Film 2003
Summer Film 2003
Quibbles and bits
Tip of the Week
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |