|
|
|
bars & clubs restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Eye Exam Deciphering "The Cremaster Cycle"
Matthew Barney is here for the duration.
The sculptor has long drawn accusations of preposterousness and
puffery, not the least because he chooses to work with such materials as
petroleum jelly and tapioca. Even more absurd, he has made five
feature-length films to showcase his sculptures which, collectively,
make up what is now notoriously known as "The Cremaster Cycle," the
release each year numbered out of order ("Cremaster 3" premiered in
New York in 2002). Despite everything, I predict that Barney will
weather the conflict of opinion surrounding his work, a storm that has
reached a critical mass rivaling the spectacle of the works themselves.
Rather than attempt to reiterate the highly inconclusive arguments
surrounding Barney and his work (a Google search will net you hours of
reading)--I prefer instead to put forth some thoughts for a first
encounter with "Cremaster."
Perhaps most important when delving into Barney's engrossing visual
practice is to not appraise the experience with apathy. Barney's films,
filled with imagery conceived from a point of view in which the disjunct
wholes of each film are greater than the sum of their parts, require
active engagement. Beyond that, keep in mind--and this is hard to do
when you're watching a movie--that you're not expected to
approach this experience like you're watching a film. OK? Not a film.
This is an especially complex task since Barney places his films in the
context of popular cinema.
Barney imagines his films in a way that departs radically from
conventional notions about the consumption of popular cinema. For
Barney, rather, these films are a vehicle for his sculptures in which
spatial relations, shapes and forms are embedded in whole schemes of
weird symbols and allusions, metaphors, signs and invented, highly
autobiographical systems of (at times explicitly occult) ceremony.
Barney's visual practice shares a distant relation to cubism, especially
the Bergsonist concern with time as the basis of reality. His seizure of
film's time-based processes, and his placement of his sculptures in this
context, parallels the arrangement of cubism's two-dimensional picture
plane in such a way that, so the theory goes, the multiple points of
view of a three-dimensional object can be simultaneously viewed.
Nonetheless, when confronted with that corpse rising from the ground,
or when the fleshy tubule prolapses out of a character's rectum
spilling a mouthful of broken teeth, hang tight. Equally, if the
monotony of certain events manages to get under your skin--like watching
those cars slowly ram the Imperial New Yorker until it's reduced to a
fist-sized chunk of metal--don't start getting anxious. This is Barney's
strategy for opening up the observational faculties of his audience; if
you become bored, remember that boredom is just a species of
frustration.
Moments of piercing melancholy give way to experiences of sympathetic
elation, the peaks and valleys of the life-process that Barney
elaborates. He derives. to a highly ritualized degree, from the
anatomical framework that is the starting point for the films: the
cremaster muscle, which raises or lowers the testicles in response to
temperature or stimuli such as fear and desire. A second concern is the
process of sexual differentiation in the womb: in Barney's metaphoric
take, the gonads ascend to form the female, and descend to form the male
foetus. As models, the process of sexual differentiation and the
cremaster muscle, if not definitive, are moderately pervasive visual
leitmotifs for this concern with ascent and descent. This concept
gets further abstracted into what appears to be Barney's enthrallment
with natural cycles of vitality, inertia and rejuvenation, and the
spirituality of those elements as they relate to his artistic project.
Into these cycles, Barney self-consciously manages to incorporate
autobiographical elements of his own celebrity's rise and fall.
The popularity of these films extends their role as a vehicle for art
into notions of film as an art in and of itself. Barney's desire
to operate at this level seems to explain the acceptance of, and even
participation in, Barney's films by rock musicians, who make up the only
other American art form popular enough to challenge the dominance of
film for mass-culture superiority. In one scene, the hardcore band
Agnostic Front incites a mass of "hooligans" into a slam-dancing
frenzy; in another, former Slayer drummer Dave Lombardo plays drums to
the amplified sound of swarming bees. In the end, however, Barney still
views these films purely as vehicles for his sculptural project, and not
cinema. And so, the "Cremaster" cycle requires that viewers attempt to
temporarily suspend the impulse for weary abstention. Maybe this is
asking too much. Even so, George Santayana's astute proposition that
"beauty is pleasure objectified" may prove instructive when viewing
Barney's films for the first time. The payoff of a sympathetic
perspective to the highly personalized pleasures of art presented in
"The Cremaster Cycle" may yield no less than the joy of a previously
unimagined art, newly born in the world. "The Cremaster Cycle" is being screened in its entirety this
week at Landmark's Century Centre Cinema, 2828 North Clark,
(773)248-7744.
Also by Michael Workman Eye Exam
Eye Exam
Eye Exam
Eye Exam
Sex in Public
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |