|
|
|
bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video food and drink music and clubs stage style words sports features |
|
|
![]() Button it up Accessorizing war
The day America went to war I was out in the northwest suburbs and ran
into a friend I hadn't seen since high school. As we hugged goodbye and
made vague noncommittal plans to meet again, my eyes glossed over the
gold-embossed flag pinned tidily onto her red cardigan. Immediately, I
blanched. Oh no, I thought, she's one of them. I rashly attributed the
decision to accessorize a la Betsy Ross to a suburban mentality that I
had left behind. I was equating pro-America with pro-war and
condescending in my mind toward my friend for following a mother who'd
tied a yellow ribbon round the old oak tree. That's a lot of baggage in
a pin.
Attendees of this year's Academy Awards worried over choosing just
the proper neutral-yet-concerned accessory that would also complement
their Harry Winstons, struggling between peace signs or American flag
pins and finally deciding on neither. A few celebrities wore the
tasteful Picasso-influenced gold dove pin. Likewise, a private war is
being waged on the lapels of everyday citizens. Here in the city, the
navy blue "No War" button with the white star is fighting with
patriotic flair in an accessory street theater of sorts.
Of course, it's judgmental to surmise one's politics based on the
fashion choices, isn't it? Like the ad campaign for the early nineties
drugstore perfume Exclamation, political buttons allow passersby to make
a statement without saying a word. To wear red, white, and blue somehow
equates checking Republican, replacing French with freedom, enrolling
your next of kin into the army, saying things like, "Oh, that Rush
Limbaugh, he's a clever one." On the flip side, no longer can we
identify radical dissenters by their fashion, as ex-hippies wear
suspenders and Baby GAP sells bellbottoms, save for their buttons and a
nostalgic waft of patchouli.
Was it Lenin who predicted that ethics would be the aesthetics of the
future revolution? "No blood for oil" replaces "make love not war"
as a rallying cry during antiwar protests, supporting the troops becomes
the human face of supporting the war during patriotic rallies. At least
the motley crew of antiwar protestors has a sense of irony, with clever
slogans and human bumper stickers that craftily reclaim duct tape and
plastic sheeting.
It's a Siamese struggle, symbolized by the poster spotted at a
rally, of Saddam and Bush side by side, asking "Twins Separated at
Birth?". The propaganda during gatherings of both those who support and
those who oppose the current conflict reflects the theatrics of abortion
rallies, all smoke and mirrors and rhetoric, fetuses and wirehangers
replaced by images of slain Iraqis, molested by one of two Big Brothers.
The name claimed by one side of the abortion debate begs the question,
who isn't pro-life? The same for the name seized by the antiwar
naysayers. Does pro-peace negate patriotism? Can a No War button and an
American flag co-exist peacefully side by side on the same lapel or book
bag? I mean, who isn't pro-peace?
Maybe that should be a button.
Also by Kate Zambreno Sew fine
24 Hour Party People
Tip of the Week
The Mourning After
Freezing mad
The wait is over
Looking for a Buddy
Veteran's luck
Everything 101
Doggie smile
Afterlife, unlisted
Red Hot
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |