|
|
|
classifieds newsletter signup bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() Time regained Steven Soderbergh makes "Solaris" his own
What is more beautiful than the one who has gone away?
Absence makes the heart grow fonder, fantasy forgives, desire
embellishes. Sentiments like these lie at the heart of "Solaris,"
Steven Soderbergh's marital drama in a science-fiction setting. It's
more "Scenes from an Intergalactic Marriage" than a revisiting of
Andrei Tarkovsky's 1972 adaptation of Stanislaw Lem's novel, with
Soderbergh's usual take on female-male relationships as being
essentially parasitic. Soderbergh's "Solaris," which draws
conspicuously from Tarkovsky's script with only a modest credit to its
current rights holders, is a different beast from the Russian master's
fatiguing 165-minute version.
In reviews of Soderbergh's "Solaris," countless comparisons are
being made to the earlier picture, which has just been reissued in a
comprehensive Criterion DVD edition. Tarkovsky quests for the spiritual
in his handful of films. 2002's "Solaris," by contrast, takes on a
narrower focus, a chilly skepticism about relationships that reigns in
so much of Soderbergh's work--the eternal, inviolable unknowability of
another.
"Solaris," measured in its pacing, begins in a future Chicago of
"Blade Runner" broodiness, a site of gleaming horizontals, indirect
lighting and sluicing gray rain. The place of memory is a place of rain,
the place of dreaming is drown. Rain falls like tears, a vale of
translucence.
Chris Kelvin (George Clooney) is a psychiatrist whose troubled wife
Rheya (Natascha McElhone) died a few years before the story begins;
he's still steeped in his private funk. A space station named
Prometheus, circling the water planet Solaris, has cut off communication
with Earth, and a cryptic video dispatch to Kelvin insists he's the
only person who can right what's wrong. Once he's on the ship, after
meeting the two remaining scientists on board (Jeremy Davies, Viola
Davis) hallucinations are the order of the day, including one of his
late wife, who can recall only what parts of her life her husband knew.
"I'm not the person I remember," this apparition insists.
The production design is doleful, abundant in its cool dread. (Note
Rheya's first appearance on a train, a black handprint shimmering on a
transparent divider as she leaves Kelvin's sight.) The prolific
Soderbergh is a hands-on breakneck auteurist but also a superlative
director of photography, with astonishingly beautiful metalline-gleaming
cinematography, like the 35mm "fictional" portions of "Full
Frontal."
Darts of hate have been shot toward this sleek, dreamily paced film,
such as the pitiless pissiness exhibited by Jonathan Rosenbaum in the
Reader. Roger Ebert took from this "Solaris" much the same feelings I
did, aligning it with Soderbergh's obsessions, yet other reviews have
been rife with a manner of possessive, you-don't-know-art exclusionary
attacks that seem removed from criticism, yet very near clubbiness. It
almost seems a kind of Rorschach for critics, ascertaining canonical
reverence versus a filmmaker's right to explore a text after one's own
fashion. (Should one never see a "Hamlet" after the first time, in
high school, or college?)
Rosenbaum describes the admittedly slow 95-minute film as
"funereal," and goes on to describe Viola Davis, a vivid actress even
when standing motionless, as "a PC replacement for a white male in the
original." Ascribing authorial intentions is a dangerous thing. To
presume Soderbergh chooses actors for political reasons rather than
talent seems specious, as does giving weight to whatever flip remarks
Clooney has made about the 1972 "Solaris" being a lesser Tarkovsky
film. The telegraphic quality rankles some critics, epigrammatic
declarations such as "We are in a situation beyond morality!"; "It's
the puppet's dream, being human"; "There are no answers, only
choices"; and "I'm suicidal because that's how you remember me!"
Soderbergh's film--let's not even call it a "version"--is earnest
work. Its look is crisp, its actors striking. Jeremy Davies'
discombobulated mannerist acting is freakish in its gestural
specificity, and Clooney plays a man who stopped reacting after his wife
died. McElhone, as a fantasy projection, is lit as a fantasy creature: a
human being Kelvin could never decipher, a woman who he could only
revere, and in the process, find the substantial abyss in their
relationship to be a source of irritation.
It was intriguing to see the rapt attention of the paying audience I
saw the film with, a rare treat for a reviewer. "I could tell you
what's happening but I don't know that will tell you what's
happening," Davies says early on. Even the sound design is muffling,
distant, that of enplaned white noise, the soft yet damp susurration of
travel thirty thousand feet or higher from earth's surface. Cliff
Martinez's steel-drum echoic Steve Reich-like ache is one more strand
of melancholy, one further swath of mood that makes "Solaris" closer
to the work of Soderbegh colleague Mike Nichols than the mysticism of
Tarkovsky or the frosty skepticism of Kubrick. There's truly only one
indication, late in the film, that the earthbound portions are set in
Chicago, when a subway train rushes past a transparent backdrop of the
Merchandise Mart El station: zschoom, zschoom, zschoom. In the
end, there is neither life nor death, merely love in the city in a
garden. The stubborn enigma in elusive riddles. The sorrow in the dream
that is memory. "Solaris" is now playing.
Also by Ray Pride Turn into the slide
Perfectly mediocre
Tip of the Week
Imitation of Life
Tip of the Week
Purty mouth
Tip of the Week
Spy-eyed
Tip of the Week
Nice picture
Tip of the Week
Anger mismanagement
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |