|
|
|
classifieds newsletter signup bars & clubs movie clock restaurants specials best of chicago film and video music and clubs stage sports words art features |
|
|
![]() Victorian Secret What's old is nude again in "Possession"
Neil LaBute directed a movie that's quiet, almost polite.
The 41-year-old writer/director, first known for "In The Company of
Men," has just finished two features: the romantic intrigue
"Possession," from A. S. Byatt's intelligent, intricate best-seller,
and the filming of his recent play, "The Shape of Things."
"Possession" intertwines two passions in two periods. In the modern
day, icy Brit gender-studies prof Maud (Gwyneth Paltrow) is forced to
reevaluate her research when American grad student and poet-manqué
Roland (Aaron Eckhart) finds letters between his subject, Randolph
Henry
Ash (Jeremy Northam), a Robert Browning-like Victorian poet, and
Christabel Motte (Jennifer Ehle), a lesser-known fictionalized poet of
that time. The more the modern duo uncover, the more they find
themselves admiring, desiring and resisting each other, leading to a
more tentative romance than the fiery affair that sweeps the two proper
Victorians away.
LaBute laughs when I asked whether the handsome, almost austere
"Possession" will be viewed as a departure. "For the three months
until 'The Shape of Things' comes out!" He grins. "Then people will
go, 'Look, you hate women again, what happened? You were doing so
good.' That's just the way it goes. I was interested in it as a
reader as much as anything. The idea that this romance has come out
[under my name] rather than an examination of the ends of
relationships,
yeah. A momentary departure, but I wouldn't set my compass by it.
It's
only the fourth movie [I've made]. It makes for a very small departure
in a very small body of work."
One constant in his features is the casting of Aaron Eckhart, a good
friend of LaBute for more than a decade. A good luck charm drawn from
theater days? "I owe him money. Y'know. So what are you going to
do?"
The smile again. "Probably because of the fact that we're friends and
that I've known him for as long as I have, I get even more intrigued
by
him. He doesn't have the same kind of celebrity Gwyneth has, but
I've known him for ten years. I know the guy yet he can still
walk onto a set and disappear into a role. I haven't been able to find
a role in his age range that I don't think he can do. And I like being
around him, watching him work. He's my guy."
Paltrow was a different story. "She was obvious. It was more a
question of, 'Do I want to do something that's so obvious and
right?'," he says. "Everything that a studio could want was there:
she'd had success in period films, success at the box office in
general, she had done British dialect, not just once, but many times. A
star, a celebrity, she's a great actress. She has managed to be one of
the handful of contemporary actors who are iconic as well. People are
interested in pictures of where she goes to get coffee. When
it's so obvious, you second-guess yourself. I was going, 'That's too
perfect, isn't it?' In fact, we need someone like her, not just to
play the part, but to get the film going. We need someone who will be
the keystone to this, because I am very interested in having Aaron be
in
this, and they're not going to look at that, and say, 'Oh he's the
obvious choice.' It's all about track record in the studio system."
We've had a hundred years of Freud, but it seems like Victorians get
the unhesitant, smoldering sex here. "Both Laura [Jones, the
co-writer]
and I loved the idea that it's really the Victorian story that seems
the most passionate. That in this very strict environment in which the
Victorians lived--and albeit, they're poets, they're not street
cleaners who have very limited leisure and a very limited education.
These people, they couldn't literally meet someone and say, 'Y'know,
I am so knocked out by you, I don't know what to do, I don't want to
walk out of this room and I'll never see you again.' They had to go
and write a letter, 'Oh it would be so lovely to perhaps see
you...'"
When the first letter is found, Roland's ideas about his education are
shaken, and then his reluctance to love in our modern world. "When
Roland finds [the first letters], it just shakes the world, the
foundations of his scholarship. 'Wait a minute, I know everything
about
Ash, he was married and he was a scientist and I can tell you
everything
he wrote, he never spoke to another woman, let alone... These just
can't be his.' That creates a passion inside Roland. But the idea [we
were challenged to capture is] that the Victorians could only speak in
a
figurative, metaphoric language of their writing or their poems, their
letter writing. They were willing to put this physically to the test,
'Let's run away together for a month. It'll only be a month but
it'll be ours.' Those people were in a society that would have looked
mercilessly down on them, who were willing to risk that, and to say,
'No matter what happens, no matter how bad it gets, it was worth it,
because of the way I feel about you.' And I think Maud and Roland were
very sure about what they [thought they would] learn from the past and
are quite shaken in the end by what they actually learn."
So freedom is not what it's cracked up to be? "In an age of
complete consent and freedom, we're often kind of blinded by the sheer
amount of choices. You can do anything you want. Talk to anybody, say
anything, within a very broad amount of reason, and they are either
blinded by those choices or they've been burned by them. They're
frightened to take a plunge again and so they learn something valuable
from people they thought there was nothing left to learn about." "Possession" opens Friday.
Also by Ray Pride EVERYMAN OF ACTION
TIP OF THE WEEK
OFF CAMERA
TIP OF THE WEEK
CANDID CAMERA
TIP OF THE WEEK
YOU'VE GOT ASS
TIP OF THE WEEK
MICE DREAMS
TIP OF THE WEEK
TIP OF THE WEEK
SIGHT GAGS
|
|
about Newcitychicago | about Newcity magazine | advertising | privacy policy | FAQ | employment |